|
Post by tampagm on Jul 30, 2009 8:44:09 GMT -5
I posted Turco already and I know YOU said he does not deserve to be more than 78, but I cannot let this go.
I also realize that you said no arguments in the thread, so I started my own thread.
I also realize that everyone will think I am bitching again, but I don’t care, because I do not agree with the re-rates for all of the goalies in general.
He played the most games of any goalie in the NHL Tied for 8th in the league in wins with 33 Dipietro gets to be rated 80ov after missing an entire season? Bryzgalov gets to be rated 80 ov despite having only 26 wins and 31 losses, not to mention a higher GAA than Turco and similar SV% Giguere is 80 ov with only 19 wins along with his 3.00GAA and similar SV% to Turco Harding get to be rated 79 ov with only 3 wins and 9 losses? Thx to his awesome other stats.
According to these re-rates, Turco is on par with other goalies who are pretty much know as backups.
To show my point about the rest of the goalies, I take the example of Theodore, he is rated 76 ov, yet he has 32 wins and 17 losses with .900 sv%, yet he is on par with the likes of Budaj and AL Montoya? I do not see how this is possble.
|
|
|
Post by KingsGM_Anthony on Jul 31, 2009 7:48:05 GMT -5
Montoya, b/c he was a goalie, was pro-rated.
Budaj played on one of the WORST teams in the league, and still had a respectable outcome in sv%/gaa for what was displayed in front of him.
I will get into a better explanation as I get a few minutes later on today.
I am going to sit down with most of my free time today as the work day ends at a decent hour, and Friday's are the GF's day for herself and her friends.
With that being said, I will do ALL goalies today, and try to get to position changes, and updating contracts and league files so EVERY team can send in LINES and see where they are financially.
I know for sure a few teams need to start trading.
I will explain in full later on, again, as to the goaltenders and the OV's they have, and how I got those #'s.
FYI though - in a CALCULATED FORUMLA, even with a re-rate request, TURCO's #s for his attributes are as follows, and this is EXACTLY where I will put them and leave it as:
84 85 65 89 85 78 85 95 85 NA NA 53 53 79
|
|
|
Post by tampagm on Jul 31, 2009 8:11:01 GMT -5
well if i see some of the other goalies go down like bryzgalov or harding or the others i mentioned, it will make more sense. i just felt that the range of ov ratting it vague and too widely spread out.
i cannot submit lines before this weekend, as i still do not have net access at home, but i will post an updated lineup thread with position change requests.
|
|
|
Post by KingsGM_Anthony on Jul 31, 2009 8:18:33 GMT -5
good stuff tampa and yes, like i stated, later today, you will see ratings changed. most of the changes will be between 2-3 OV weather it's UP or DOWN, but I would NOT expect to see goalie names go DOWN, nor any of the new UFA signed players. most will go UP. if anyone feels a player is TOO low or WAY TOO high - you can PM me and let me know, or find me on MSN after 1pm EST.
|
|
|
Post by tampagm on Jul 31, 2009 11:33:21 GMT -5
good stuff tampa and yes, like i stated, later today, you will see ratings changed. most of the changes will be between 2-3 OV weather it's UP or DOWN, but I would NOT expect to see goalie names go DOWN, nor any of the new UFA signed players. most will go UP. if anyone feels a player is TOO low or WAY TOO high - you can PM me and let me know, or find me on MSN after 1pm EST. i posted my latest arguments for couple players in the rerate tampa thread, with direct player comparisson.
|
|
|
Post by LeafsGM on Jul 31, 2009 16:52:20 GMT -5
hey! leave bryzgalov alone!!!
|
|